• Oakland – (510) 344-6601
  • San Francisco – (415) 252-9600
California Business Attorneys | Oakland CA
  • Professionals
    • Lonnie Finkel
    • Ruth Auerbach
  • Practices
    • Federal Practice
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
      • Intellectual Property
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Corporate
      • Tech Start-Ups
      • Real Estate & Environmental
      • Securities & Corporate Finance
  • Insights
    • Blog
    • Resources
      • Copyright Law Fundamentals
      • Protect Your Company’s Software Assets
      • Protect Your Company’s Trade Secrets
      • Crowdfunding White Paper
      • Video Tips
    • Speaking
  • Contact Us
    • 510.344.6601
    • 415.252.9600

How Title I of the JOBS Act Significantly Changed the IPO Playbook

October 20, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Title I of the JOBS ActHistorically, federal securities laws have imposed significant – some would say onerous – disclosure and reporting requirements on companies seeking to raise money in the public equities markets. Testing the market was, for the most part, unlawful for fear of conditioning the market of prospective investors to your offering. Comments from the staff of the …Read more

Filed Under: Business & Financing Tagged With: emerging growth companies, financing, raise capital, regulation

Making it Easier for Private Companies and Emerging Growth Companies to Raise Capital

September 5, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Raising Capital ImageIn April of 2012, President Obama signed into law the Jumpstart Our Businesses Startups Act (“JOBS Act”). This bipartisan legislation was designed to stimulate job growth by making it easier and less costly for smaller companies to raise capital in the United States by relaxing the regulations that apply to private offerings, initial public offerings …Read more

Filed Under: Business & Financing Tagged With: crowd funding, financing, raise capital

US Supreme Court Copyright Act Decision – ABC v Aereo

August 25, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

US Supreme Court Copyright Act DecisionDevelopers of new digital technologies that store and transmit data to customers around the world suffered a major set back on June 25, 2014 in the United States Supreme Court Copyright Act Decision in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. The court found that Aereo infringed broadcasters’ copyrights by providing its customers with access to …Read more

Filed Under: Intellectual Property Tagged With: customer contracts, Intellectual Property, Litigation

Victory in Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Case in Alameda County Superior Court

June 24, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Victory for Residential Mortgage Foreclosure ImageThe residential mortgage foreclosure crisis continues to grind onward across California resulting in the eviction of thousands of Californians from their homes. Even as numerous banks, including the largest in the United States, have paid billions of dollars in fines and penalties for their unlawful actions, they relentlessly pursue unlawful foreclosures and evictions from the …Read more

Filed Under: Litigation, Real Estate Tagged With: foreclosure, Litigation, Real estate forclosure, residential mortgage

Implications of “Raging Bull” Lawsuit for Copyright Owners

June 10, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Dust off those old songs, manuscripts and articles because on May 19, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (the “Raging Bull” lawsuit) that ensures a copyright holder has the right to enforce a copyrighted work, even if it has been dormant for many years, and receive damages, and, …Read more

Filed Under: Intellectual Property Tagged With: copyright protection, copyrights, Intellectual Property

False Advertising Claim Cases Get a New Standard

April 24, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

False Advertising Claims ImageThe ability of a plaintiff to bring false advertising claims and concerns over unfair competition under federal trademark law just got a bit easier. On March 25, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lexmark International v. Static Control Components, ruling that Static Control may proceed with its false advertising counterclaim against Lexmark under …Read more

Filed Under: Litigation Tagged With: false advertising, Litigation, unfair competition

Ten Benefits of U.S. Trademark Registration

March 28, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Trademarks are highly valuable assets. According to one recent estimate trademarks can account for as much as one-third of corporate value. The world’s most valuable brand was recently estimated to be worth more than $180 billion. The cost of securing and protecting the benefits of U.S. trademark registration is not a mere cost of doing …Read more

Filed Under: Trademark Issues Tagged With: Intellectual Property, trademark registration

Cybersecurity Protection for your California Business

March 25, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Cybersecurity Protection ImageJust as the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) completes its version 1.0 National Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, California Attorney General Kamala Harris has made clear she intends a leadership role for California. With the just published guide entitled “Cybersecurity in the Golden State: How California Businesses Can …Read more

Filed Under: Business & Financing, Intellectual Property Tagged With: cybersecurity, cybersecurity threats, Intellectual Property, legal protections

Copyright Owners Would Enjoy Greater Protections Under Legislation Pending in U.S. Congress

February 28, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Last week we discussed pending legislation working its way through the U.S. Congress that would strengthen several statutes to better protect protect IP owners from trade secret misappropriation and provide them with more sweeping and powerful remedies in the event their trade secrets are stolen. This week we discuss several pieces of legislation being proposed …Read more

Filed Under: Intellectual Property

Pending Trade Secret & Copyright Legislation Could Further Protect American IP Owners

February 25, 2014 by Lonnie_Finkel

Several bills moving their way through the United States Congress would establish or substantially amend certain federal statutes pertaining to protecting, enforcing, and exploiting trade secrets and copyrights created in the United States. Some legislation is aimed at establishing a private right of action for trade secret theft under federal law and to prevent trade …Read more

Filed Under: Intellectual Property

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • Next Page »
   
Software_Protections_White_Paper

Intellectual Property Posts

  • Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal’s Decision Finds that Likelihood of Confusion in a Trademark Case Depends on Much More than Geography
  • Best Practices for Your Company to Protect and Preserve its Trademark’s Strength Through Proper Use
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
  • United States Supreme Court Addresses Corporate Separateness and Defendant’s Profits Under the Federal Lanham Act for Trademark Infringement
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Remedies for Infringement and Principal Defenses to Infringement Claims

Connect with social media

  • linkedin
  • yelp
  • academia
  • mail

© 2009-2025 Finkel Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.

Contact Information

Oakland Office 1999 Harrison St, Ste 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 344-6601

San Francisco Office One Sansome Street, Suite 3500 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 252-9600

info@finkellawgroup.com

Disclaimer: Please be aware that you do not become a client of Finkel Law Group, P.C. nor have we established an attorney client relationship simply by your visiting the Finkel Law Group, P.C. website or by communicating to this office through this website. In addition, you understand and agree that Finkel Law Group, P.C. will have no duty to keep confidential the information you are now transmitting to this office. The content on this website is only for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.