On March 27, 2025, the President of the United States issued yet another Executive Order, supported by no provision of the U.S. Constitution or any federal statute, for the explicit purpose of punishing an American law firm. The order was entitled “Addressing Risks from WilmerHale LLP.” The President’s order openly seeks to harm WilmerHale for […]
Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
This blog is the eighth in a series that Finkel Law Group is publishing to provide our readers with a broad overview of trademark law in the United States. Protecting your company’s trademarks doesn’t always require litigation in federal court. The U.S. Trademark Office provides an administrative process for challenging pending trademark applications and existing […]
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Key Aspects and Practical Insights for Your Business
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is the cornerstone of securities regulation in the United States, providing the framework for public company disclosures, anti-fraud provisions, and the oversight of the public securities markets. Enacted as part of the response to the stock market crash of 1929 – in addition to the Securities Act […]
Finkel Law Group P.C. Joins More Than 500 Law Firms Nationwide by Signing the Amicus Curiae Brief Filed in Support of the Law Firm Perkins Coie
On March 6, 2025, the President of the United States issued an executive order, supported by no provision of the U.S. Constitution or any federal statute, entitled “Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP.” The order attacks Perkin Coie’s clients and the issues for which the firm has represented those clients for many years. The order […]
United States Supreme Court Addresses Corporate Separateness and Defendant’s Profits Under the Federal Lanham Act for Trademark Infringement
On February 26, 2025, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dewberry Group, Inc v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc. In doing so the Court reaffirmed the legal protections afforded to separately formed, organized and governed corporations. The case raised the question of whether a court could order disgorgement of profits for trademark infringement from […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- …
- 49
- Next Page »