• Oakland – (510) 344-6601
  • San Francisco – (415) 252-9600
California Business Attorneys | Oakland CA
  • Professionals
    • Lonnie Finkel
    • Ruth Auerbach
  • Practices
    • Federal Practice
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
      • Intellectual Property
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Corporate
      • Tech Start-Ups
      • Real Estate & Environmental
      • Securities & Corporate Finance
  • Insights
    • Blog
    • Resources
      • Copyright Law Fundamentals
      • Protect Your Company’s Software Assets
      • Protect Your Company’s Trade Secrets
      • Crowdfunding White Paper
      • Video Tips
    • Speaking
  • Contact Us
    • 510.344.6601
    • 415.252.9600

Understand Federal and State Securities Laws Before Raising Money

October 29, 2019 by Lonnie_Finkel

The applicability of the federal securities laws is remarkably broad. The Securities Act of 1933 defines a “security” to include stock, bonds, notes, fractional undivided interests in oil, gas and other mineral rights, and “investment contracts.” The Supreme Court analyzed such contracts in the Howey case to mean investments in a common enterprise with an expectation of profit solely through the efforts of a promoter or of someone other than the investors themselves.

Under this broad interpretation, everything from cryptographic tokens to orange groves have been held to be securities. Interests in limited liability companies have also been held to be securities, often depending on the extent to which the investing member is involved in the management of the company.

The securities laws apply both to a public offering of securities, which involve investment bankers and SEC-filed registration statements, and to non-public offerings or private placements. Despite the enormous differences in the complexity of these offerings, federal and state securities laws apply to both, even where a private placement involves only a few purchasers and a relatively small amount of money.

As a result, a seemingly routine transaction intended to raise or borrow capital to start a business, compensate employees with equity, or issue cryptographic tokens, is generally governed by the federal securities laws. Ignoring such laws can lead to civil claims for damages and/or rescission of the sale and restitution of investors’ money, criminal action, injunctive prohibitions on future involvement with securities transactions, and major reputational damage.

Below are some important points a new or existing company issuing securities should consider:

Name is not everything. The name of the financial interest being conveyed is unimportant to its characterization. Calling something a token or interest in a physical asset or promissory note will not prevent the application of federal securities law. The issuer should analyze whether the interest being conveyed meets the definition of an “investment contract” under Howey.

Exemptions. Because most transactions are not public offerings, the transaction or security itself must satisfy a specific statutory exemption under federal and state securities laws because the transaction will not be registered or qualified.

Safe Harbors. Under federal law, several exemptions known as safe harbors from the requirements to register an offering, including Regulation D, Regulation A, and Regulation CF, are the most commonly used. Clear procedures exist to facilitate compliance with each applicable exemption. These regulations may, among other things, prescribe the scope of disclosure, the ability to engage in advertising and general solicitations, the number of permitted purchasers, the maximum amount that can be raised, and the applicability of blue sky laws. It’s important to always be aware that state blue sky laws may also apply and must be complied with.

Exemptions are less expensive. Compliance with the safe harbors is almost always much less burdensome and expensive than a public offering.

Disclosure. Where applicable, issuers should create written disclosures that are complete, readable, accurate, and non-misleading. They should include (1) all relevant risks, (2) an issuer’s business plan and financial condition, and (3) management’s background and conflicts of interest, even when not explicitly required. The scope of disclosure may vary based on the sophistication of the offerees, the dollar value of the securities being sold, and other attributes of the offering. Regardless, these disclosures must be made or the offering likely violates federal and state securities laws.

General Solicitations. While for many years using the means of general solicitation to reach potential investors through advertising were strictly off limits for private placements, in recent years the SEC has relaxed these prohibitions, allowing issuers to take advantage of the Internet to communicate with potential investors, subject to compliance with the applicable regulations. If you plan to conduct general solicitation activities via the Internet it’s critical that you know and comply with all applicable federal and state regulations on such solicitations.

Sale Restrictions. Raising capital under Regulation D, Regulation A, or Regulation CF involves qualifying purchasers to ensure that potential purchasers possess the requisite financial capacity and expertise to reasonably understand and assume the risks of an offering. Sales to individual accredited investors as defined in the rules under the Securities Act of 1933 means selling only to individuals with a net worth (excluding the primary residence) of at least $1,000,000 or annual gross income of at least $200,000 (or $300,000 with a spouse). If your investors are not accredited the disclosure requirements become much more onerous, and failure to comply may result in rescission and restitution of all monies raised in the offering.

Employee Exemptions. Issuances of securities to vendors, employees, or contractors in return for their goods or services are subject to securities laws. Rule 701 is typically relied on as an exemption.

Cryptocurrencies and Tokens Can Be Securities. Recent SEC pronouncements and lawsuits regarding the applicability of the federal securities laws to cryptocurrency transactions have implications for other cases as well. Our firm’s view regarding application of the SEC’s recent crypto pronouncement is important guidance for both crypto and general capital raising activity.

Do Not Ignore State Securities Laws. In addition to federal law, securities transactions must not run afoul of applicable state laws. State blue sky laws can vary substantially by state and by transaction. California’s are particularly onerous for issuers. Sometimes the state exemptions are self-executing, meaning no documents need to be filed or fees paid. Other times both document filings and fees are required. State regulators’ communications should never be ignored.

Transfer Restrictions. Securities acquired absent a public offering cannot be freely transferred but can only be transferred by complying with the rules regarding resales of restricted securities. And that’s a whole different subject.

Finkel Law Group, with offices in San Francisco and Oakland, has more than 20 years of experience counseling private companies on compliance with federal and state securities laws in conjunction with private placements of the companies’ debt and equity securities. When you need intelligent, insightful, conscientious and cost-effective legal counsel to assist you with your IP strategy, please contact us at (415)252-9600, (510) 344-6601, or info@finkellawgroup.com to speak with one of our attorneys about your matter. Also visit us on the web at www.finkellawgroup.com to learn more about the firm.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property Tagged With: Intellectual Property Law, raise capital, state securities laws

   
Software_Protections_White_Paper

Intellectual Property Posts

  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
  • United States Supreme Court Addresses Corporate Separateness and Defendant’s Profits Under the Federal Lanham Act for Trademark Infringement
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Remedies for Infringement and Principal Defenses to Infringement Claims
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Infringement Litigation
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Cease and Desist Letters

Connect with social media

  • linkedin
  • yelp
  • academia
  • mail

© 2009-2025 Finkel Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.

Contact Information

Oakland Office 1999 Harrison St, Ste 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 344-6601

San Francisco Office One Sansome Street, Suite 3500 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 252-9600

info@finkellawgroup.com

Disclaimer: Please be aware that you do not become a client of Finkel Law Group, P.C. nor have we established an attorney client relationship simply by your visiting the Finkel Law Group, P.C. website or by communicating to this office through this website. In addition, you understand and agree that Finkel Law Group, P.C. will have no duty to keep confidential the information you are now transmitting to this office. The content on this website is only for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.