• Oakland – (510) 344-6601
  • San Francisco – (415) 252-9600
California Business Attorneys | Oakland CA
  • Professionals
    • Lonnie Finkel
    • Ruth Auerbach
  • Practices
    • Federal Practice
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
      • Intellectual Property
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Corporate
      • Tech Start-Ups
      • Real Estate & Environmental
      • Securities & Corporate Finance
  • Insights
    • Blog
    • Resources
      • Copyright Law Fundamentals
      • Protect Your Company’s Software Assets
      • Protect Your Company’s Trade Secrets
      • Crowdfunding White Paper
      • Video Tips
    • Speaking
  • Contact Us
    • 510.344.6601
    • 415.252.9600

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Key Aspects and Practical Insights for Your Business

April 25, 2025 by Lonnie_Finkel

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is the cornerstone of securities regulation in the United States, providing the framework for public company disclosures, anti-fraud provisions, and the oversight of the public securities markets. Enacted as part of the response to the stock market crash of 1929 – in addition to the Securities Act of 1933 – the Exchange Act plays a critical role in maintaining transparency, promoting investor confidence, and ensuring fair trading practices in the public securities markets.

For all businesses offering and selling their securities to the public, compliance with the Exchange Act is not optional—it is a legal obligation that can carry significant liability for non-compliance. This blog examines key aspects of the Exchange Act, including reporting obligations, anti-fraud provisions, regulatory oversight, and enforcement mechanisms. It offers practical insights for companies like yours that are navigating the complex regulatory landscape for offering and selling securities to investors in the United States.

Reporting Obligations Under the Exchange Act

One of the primary functions of the Exchange Act is to impose ongoing reporting obligations on publicly traded companies and reporting companies. By requiring regular and transparent financial disclosures, the Exchange Act ensures that investors and regulators receive accurate, up-to-date information about a company’s operations, financial health and internal governance. These disclosures help maintain market integrity, prevent fraudulent financial practices, and allow investors to have the accurate information they need to make informed investment decisions.

Public companies must comply with extensive filing requirements, which vary in scope and frequency depending on the nature of the information being reported. These reports provide important periodic insights into a company’s earnings, risks, executive decisions, and significant corporate events, which help investors assess the strength and stability of the reporting company and whether it is a viable investment opportunity.

Who Must Report?

Public companies that have registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or private companies that meet certain asset and shareholder thresholds under Section 15(d) must file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports include:

  • Form 10-K:  This is a company’s annual report which provides a comprehensive overview of the company’s financial performance, including audited financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of how the company is performing (MD&A).
  • Form 10-Q:  This is a company’s quarterly report which contains unaudited financial statements and a review of the company’s interim financial performance.
  • Form 8-K.  This is a company current report which must be filed to inform the public and regulators of any significant corporate events that have taken place like mergers, acquisitions, bankruptcy filings, or changes in executive leadership.

Your company’s failure to comply with any of these reporting requirements can result in the SEC bringing an enforcement action against you, delisting your company from a public stock exchange to which it is a member, and possibly investor lawsuits for non-compliance with the law and securities fraud.

Anti-Fraud Provisions and Rule 10b-5 Under the Exchange Act

The Exchange Act contains some of the most important and far-reaching anti-fraud provisions in Federal Securities Laws, particularly the anti-fraud provisions in Section 10(b) of the Act and SEC Rule 10b-5.  These laws and regulations serve as the backbone of federal securities fraud law enforcement. They prohibit deceptive and manipulative practices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities anywhere in the United States. The goal is to ensure that investors receive truthful and complete information before making investment decisions and to deter fraudulent schemes in the offer and sale of securities that would harm the investing public and undermine public confidence in the markets.

Rule 10b-5 is one of the most frequently invoked securities laws in both SEC enforcement actions and private securities litigation.  Companies, executives, and financial professionals must take great care in their public statements, financial reporting, and securities transactions to avoid becoming embroiled in civil action in federal court that could result in the imposition of personal liability under the broad and powerful anti-fraud provisions found the rule.

Elements of a Rule 10b-5 Violation

To establish a violation of Rule 10b-5, the SEC or private plaintiffs must demonstrate:

  • Material Misrepresentation or Omission – A false statement or omission of a material fact that would influence an investor’s decision.
  • Scienter (Intent or Recklessness) – The defendant acted with the intent to deceive the investor or with reckless disregard for the truth.
  • Connection to a Securities Transaction – The misrepresentation was made in connection with the offer and sale of securities to investors in the U.S.
  • Reliance – The investors relied on the misrepresentation when making investment decisions.
  • Economic Loss and Causation – The fraud directly caused financial harm to investors.

Violations of Rule 10b-5 can lead to SEC enforcement actions, civil penalties, and private securities fraud lawsuits.

Regulation of Exchanges, Brokers, and Other Market Participants

Beyond corporate reporting and anti-fraud provisions, the Exchange Act establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for national securities exchanges, broker-dealers, securities analysts, and credit rating agencies. These regulations are designed to ensure the fair and orderly operation of the public securities markets, prevent conflicts of interest among broker-dealers, and promote transparency and market stability by setting strict compliance and operational standards for financial professionals and financial institutions who offer and sell securities in the U.S.

The regulation of market participants under the Exchange Act is essential for protecting both retail and institutional investors. By enforcing transparency and ethical and lawful conduct in securities transactions, the Act seeks to prevent manipulative sales practices such as insider trading, front-running, account churning, pump and dump schemes, and misleading financial disclosures that undermine the public’s trust in the securities markets.

National Securities Exchanges

The SEC oversees major stock exchanges, including the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and Nasdaq, to ensure fair and orderly markets participation.  Stock exchanges must:

  • Maintain listing standards for companies.
  • Implement surveillance mechanisms to detect market manipulation.
  • Comply with SEC and self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) rules.

Broker-Dealer Regulation

Under Section 15 of the Exchange Act, brokers and dealers must register with the SEC and comply with detailed regulatory and licensing requirements, including:

  • Net capital requirements to maintain financial stability.
  • Best execution obligations to ensure fair trade execution for clients.
  • Customer protection rules governing custody of client assets.

Failure to comply with these legal obligations can result in fines, suspension or revocation of registration and licensure.

Enforcement and Liability Under the Exchange Act

The SEC has broad enforcement powers under the Exchange Act, including the ability to bring civil and administrative actions against persons and companies that violate the law. Additionally, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) can pursue criminal charges for egregious violations of Federal Securities Laws. The enforcement of securities laws is critical to maintaining the integrity of financial markets and deterring misconduct by unscrupulous individuals and institutions.

Investigations and enforcement actions under the Exchange Act can have severe consequences for businesses and individuals, including monetary penalties, reputational damage, and even criminal liability.  Companies must be proactive in ensuring compliance and responding swiftly to regulatory inquiries to mitigate potential legal and financial exposure.

Types of Enforcement Actions

The Exchange Act has empowered the federal government with a number of enforcement tools to compel compliance with the law.  They include the following:

  • Civil Penalties can include monetary fines for non-compliance with the reporting or anti-fraud provisions of the law.
  • Administrative Sanctions can include suspensions or revocations of securities licenses.
  • Criminal Prosecution for fraudulent activities involving willful or reckless misconduct can lead to criminal charges, fines and possibly imprisonment.

The SEC’s enforcement actions can result in significant financial penalties, reputational damage, and, in some cases, personal liability for corporate executives who are found responsible for violations of federal securities laws.

Compliance Strategies for Businesses

Given the complexity and broad scope of the Exchange Act, businesses should adopt proactive preventative compliance strategies to mitigate risks and avoid regulatory scrutiny. Compliance requires a coordinated effort by your company that typically involves implementing strong internal controls, ensuring proper legal oversight, and providing employee education and training to prevent inadvertent violations of the legal requirements and respond effectively to SEC inquiries.

Best Practices for Exchange Act Compliance

  • Implement Strong Internal Controls by developing and enforcing robust financial reporting and disclosure policies.
  • Conduct Regular Training to educate your company’s executives and employees on securities law compliance and insider trading rules.
  • Engage Legal Counsel to guide your company’s compliance efforts and respond appropriately to SEC inquiries.
  • Perform Internal Audits to review financial statements and SEC filings for accuracy and completeness before filing them with the commission and disclosing them to the public.
  • Establish Whistleblower Protections to encourage internal reporting of potential violations before they escalate into much larger regulatory investigations or even civil actions in federal court.

How Experienced Legal Counsel Can Help

Understanding and adhering to the many requirements of the Exchange Act is not merely a legal necessity.  It is a strategic imperative for companies and financial institutions offering and selling securities in the public and private markets.  Developing and implementing effective compliance programs will help to prevent regulatory penalties, enhance corporate transparency, and foster investor trust. Companies that proactively address their reporting obligations, implement rigorous internal controls, and seek knowledgeable legal guidance can mitigate risk and position themselves for sustainable growth.  A critical component of any compliance program is to educate your employees in your company’s ethical culture of complying with all laws and regulations, including those pertaining to the securities markets.  For California companies navigating these detailed regulations, partnering with experienced securities attorneys is a good first step to maintaining compliance with the law and ensuring long-term success of your company in an increasingly complex regulatory environment for offering and selling securities.

About Finkel Law Group

Finkel Law Group with offices in San Francisco and Oakland, has more than 28 years of experience helping our clients navigate federal and state securities laws and regulations.  Over the last 28 years we have assisted hundreds of privately held companies raise capital in compliance with federal and states securities laws so they can grow their businesses and thrive. 

When you need intelligent, insightful, conscientious and cost-effective legal counsel to assist your company with compliance with federal and state securities laws, please contact us at (415) 252-9600, (510) 344-6601, or info@finkellawgroup.com to speak with one of our attorneys.

Filed Under: Securities

   

Connect with social media

  • linkedin
  • yelp
  • academia
  • mail

© 2009-2025 Finkel Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.

Contact Information

Oakland Office 1999 Harrison St, Ste 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 344-6601

San Francisco Office One Sansome Street, Suite 3500 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 252-9600

info@finkellawgroup.com

Disclaimer: Please be aware that you do not become a client of Finkel Law Group, P.C. nor have we established an attorney client relationship simply by your visiting the Finkel Law Group, P.C. website or by communicating to this office through this website. In addition, you understand and agree that Finkel Law Group, P.C. will have no duty to keep confidential the information you are now transmitting to this office. The content on this website is only for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.