• Oakland – (510) 344-6601
  • San Francisco – (415) 252-9600
California Business Attorneys | Oakland CA
  • Professionals
    • Lonnie Finkel
    • Ruth Auerbach
  • Practices
    • Federal Practice
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
      • Intellectual Property
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Corporate
      • Tech Start-Ups
      • Real Estate & Environmental
      • Securities & Corporate Finance
  • Insights
    • Blog
    • Resources
      • Copyright Law Fundamentals
      • Protect Your Company’s Software Assets
      • Protect Your Company’s Trade Secrets
      • Crowdfunding White Paper
      • Video Tips
    • Speaking
  • Contact Us
    • 510.344.6601
    • 415.252.9600

Management-Investor Conflict Can Lead to Costly Disruption of Business

October 14, 2013 by Williem Bard

Management-Investor Conflict ImageUnfortunately, it is not unusual for the owners of a privately held business – whether it be partners of a partnership, members of a limited liability company, or shareholders of a corporation – to become embroiled in conflict over management of the company.  This management-investor conflict can, at best, cause substantial disruptions to the operation and profitability of the company, and, at worst, lead to costly lawsuits and possibly dissolution of the enterprise.  In either case, both management and investors lose, as do customers, employees and vendors.

Often management-investor conflict stem from poor or even dishonest management decisions that waste the company’s assets, usurp corporate opportunities, and misappropriate company funds or assets.  These decisions often enrich management at the expense of the non-managing partners, members or shareholders.  These disputes, however, can also arise from poor communications.  Management simply fails to keep the non-managing parties in the loop on important decisions about the company’s business.

When investors view managements’ actions or decisions as wrongful, they can and should demand as much information about the company as the law allows investors to review.  This includes the company’s books and records, which will provide the investors with a considerable amount of insight on how management is taking care of the company’s assets and protecting against liabilities.  Not surprisingly, managements’ response to these types of information requests is frequently slow, partial, ignored, or simply refused.  Refusal of these requests only raises suspicions higher, and heightens the investors desire for information about the company and how its assets are being managed.

What can an investor do when her request for the company’s books and records is refused?

If management of the company refuses to grant access to company documents and information, the investors can file a writ of mandate with the superior court that has jurisdiction over the company.  Generally, that is the county where the company maintains its corporate headquarters or has significant business operations.  A writ of mandate is a pleading that asks the superior court for an order directing the company’s management to provide the partner, member or shareholder with access to the company’s books and records.  The writ procedure is authorized under California’s Civil Procedure and Corporations Code.  It’s an expedited procedure that can be quickly filed, usually heard by the court within 60 days, and avoids much of the time and expense of filing a full blown lawsuit against the company and its management

Finkel Law Group, with offices in San Francisco and Walnut Creek, has extensive experience negotiating and litigating a resolution of the disputes that can arise among the owners of partnerships, limited liability companies, and corporations.  The firm has particular expertise prosecuting and defending against writs of mandate seeking company books and records.  If you need intelligent, insightful, conscientious and cost-effective legal counsel to assist you with a business dispute or transaction, please contact us at our Oakland Office (510) 344-6601, or San Francisco (415) 252-9600, or  info@finkellawgroup.com to speak with one of our attorneys about your matter.

Filed Under: Litigation Tagged With: corporate law, Litigation

   

Litigation Posts

  • United States Supreme Court Addresses Corporate Separateness and Defendant’s Profits Under the Federal Lanham Act for Trademark Infringement
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Remedies for Infringement and Principal Defenses to Infringement Claims
  • Enforcing Your Company’s Trademark Rights: Infringement Litigation
  • Protecting Your Company’s Real Property Rights Through the Federal Courts
  • Remedies Available in Federal Court to Help Resolve Business Disputes

Connect with social media

  • linkedin
  • yelp
  • academia
  • mail

© 2009-2025 Finkel Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.

Contact Information

Oakland Office 1999 Harrison St, Ste 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 344-6601

San Francisco Office One Sansome Street, Suite 3500 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 252-9600

info@finkellawgroup.com

Disclaimer: Please be aware that you do not become a client of Finkel Law Group, P.C. nor have we established an attorney client relationship simply by your visiting the Finkel Law Group, P.C. website or by communicating to this office through this website. In addition, you understand and agree that Finkel Law Group, P.C. will have no duty to keep confidential the information you are now transmitting to this office. The content on this website is only for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.